It is definitely upgrade time for me... but i dont know if i should just buy a barton and a Abit NF7-s v2.0 ...
or just wait to buy a 64 and a mobo that supports that...
i currently have a 1.4 tbird and i wanna hear what some of you guys would do.
Thanks
0
Comments
The Athlon 64s will be really expensive on release though, so you might have to wait for prices to start to drop.
Its really up to you. Do you need a more powerful machine now? Does it do what you want it to? If it does, then upgrading can wait.
Either way, im gonna wait for them.
mD
and for that we gonna need new mobo's, right?
About 6 months after release, prices should start to drop. Initial prices will probably be very high though probably in the region of $500 a pop.
Clock speeds wont be too amazing either, but dont be fooled by this, since were talking about 64bit here, the Athlon 64 will process twice as much per clock cycle.
Were talking total system overhauls with this new technology. Decent quality high speed DDR RAM, SATA disks in RAIDs, and PCI-X graphics boards will be required to take advantage.
To reap the benefits of the 64bit mode of the CPU, a 64bit OS will be required. Windows XP Pro will be recompiled for use with the Athlon 64.
mD
and what exactly is a pci-x graphics card? are they only the recent ones?
and what clock speeds are you anticipating at breakout... just wondering.. i know it doesnt directly translate to speed...?
The next generation of graphics card will stop using AGP as it is dated and slow, and will move to the PCI Express interface. The next generation ATI boards will be availible in AGP, but theyll just have a PCI Express to AGP bridge system on board. AGP will be gradually phased out over the next year or two.
That memory should work just fine with the Athlon 64.
Hope this helps.
mD
EDIT: Stoopid mistakes
I don't think you're gonna see PCI-X graphics... PCI Express cards are the next generation for both ATi and Nvidia, and I seriously doubt they're going to make PCI-X cards, as PCI-X is a server/workstation standard, and it's a lot slower than PCI Express anyhow.
Its late, im tired, need sleep.
Sorry about that, got 2 things mixed up.
mD
since i was at it... i thought i would just upgrade the whole bundle...
im still kinda torn...
thanks for all the help btw!
Get a decent case with a good PSU, a TFT, and maybe sling some RAM in your old computer since RAM is dirt cheap, and youll get a slight short term boost in performance, and the long term benefit of a foundation for a kick ass system.
mD
anyone know when the 64 is coming out?
Good thing is though, the 64 will be DDR400 rather than DDR333 at this later release date, and we can expect more core optimisations too.
mD
Wow - I helped! Yippee!
and hopefully buy the 64 around christmas time.... i can wait until then...
thanks for the help guys!!
torque
u think around december - january it will be doable? cuz thats how im hardwiring my thoughts
mD
IMO Grab a Barton and a NF2 Ultra400 motheboard.
You're not going to want a Athlon 64 until they reach 2.0ghz or better, And as of right now an A64 3100+ = 1.80ghz
You can match that right now with a Barton 2500+ running at FSB400 2.0 - 2.1ghz
?
mD
Take the 386 for example, ran all the 16bit software and hardware just fine.
mD
I do agree but just got a little carried away!;) I would still wait though since I don't want to be a high priced guinnea pig! First on my block isn't always a priority since it pays to wait on occasion.
NS
Also if you aren't running a 64bit capable OS your A64 will act just like a 1MB Cache Athlon XP (not necessarily a bad thing...)
The reports I read today say a 3100+ (1.80ghz) & 3400+ (2.00ghz?) will be available at launch in Aug. So the prices will be at or above P4 prices of that speed. (>$400)
and when you say
To this i have two questions...
1. What new hardware besides a new mobo would u need...? I doubt you'd need new ram or new hd's or anything like that... but i could be wrong. Maybe a new printer?:D
2. When the 32 bit stuff came out.. it ran the 16 bit software and the like... Why wouldn't the 64 run the 32 and 16 bit s/w... i know we cant be sure.. but i dont see why it wouldn't be backwards compatible...
thanks