LMAO WTG Intel
My god... I almost choked on the highlighter in my mouth when I saw this on newegg's frontpage.
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduct.asp?description=19-116-167&DEPA=1
I'm sure these things won't overclock worth "poop" because of the extra cache. Extreme computers are obtained through overclocking, EE cpu's won't overclock, therefore to obtain an extreme cpu you must buy a 3.2C and overclock it.
Tricky, Tricky
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduct.asp?description=19-116-167&DEPA=1
I'm sure these things won't overclock worth "poop" because of the extra cache. Extreme computers are obtained through overclocking, EE cpu's won't overclock, therefore to obtain an extreme cpu you must buy a 3.2C and overclock it.
Tricky, Tricky
0
Comments
<i>Raising prices, lowering performance.</i>
2 EE sales.
1 to OPPainter and the other to some little rich 12 year old.
I'm 17 goddamnit... get it right!
I'm actually trying to find someone putting them in the Clevo (Sager) 8890s... if I get a new laptop now, I'd really rather have the P4-EE than the regular 3.2-C, if I can fit the -EE in the budget...
//edit: It's faster in just about everything but media rendering...And it costs muy less. But the registered RAM (What the **** were they thinking?) makes the difference go away.
i rather buy diamonds, at least they wont go down in price for some time
I like both intel and amd... but daaammmnnn My system with monitor keyboard and mouse speakers and desk is not worth a 1000 dollars. If I want one I gotta donate a kidney or something... LOL ill take the athlon64 please..
dude it wont go down in price not for sometime and I doubt it will ever sell for what you can get the 2.4c for...
Gobbles
Sprint.. ?? Are you a weighlifter when you aren't destroying PC's??
Last time I checked, destop replacement laptops were heavy. Sprint?? Stagger more like it.
I used to carry 56lbs on my shoulder countless times a day at my former employer (a few years back).. 13lbs is nothing
My point was that you "sprint" with your "portable".. both of which seem a bit.. unlikely with a 13lb notebook
"Sprint: To move rapidly or at top speed for a brief period, as in running or swimming." -Dictionary.com
I see no conflict here.
Oh Mr Pedantic checks the dictionary :banghead:
You appear to have missed the humour mate
I was indicating that "sprint" involved you staggering (in a jogging type manner) out of breath, with one shoulder lower than the other due to the weight
I think Il go to work, you continue to tax my brain
I still don't get it...
(You realize I'm doing this just to bug you, right?
It's 7.30am UK GMT and I have had this type of conversation with you in the morning, in so many threads in the past, it's almost like a "tradition".
Go look up that smartass
/me scurries off to ebay to make some changes to ongoing auctions
THIS JUST IN:
SUPER MEGA EXTREME UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE : CHANGE CHANNELS AT THE SAME RATE AS A NORMAL TV REMOTE...BUT...EXTREME...HIDE YOUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN, GRANDMOTHERS AND SMALL ANIMALS BECAUSE EXTREME CHANNEL SURFING IS COMING TO A POSSIBLY EXTREME COUCH NEAR YOU*
*extremeness of couch not guaranteed, please check with your extreme furniture supplier for available couch extreme models.
And in other news:
Intel Pentium4 Computer Awesomness Super Hyperthreaded (CASH) edition coming soon to an EXTREME INTEL RETAILER NEAR YOU
*Estimated pricing for Intel Pentium4 CASH Edition is expected to fall somewhere between the 'home mortgage' and 'SOUL' range. Unfortunately, Intel Execs. will not be able to use the 'Soul' option when obtaining a loan for purchase of the Intel Pentium4 CASH Edition.
<I>pron.</I> <I>pl.</I> <B>those </B>(<I>th</I><IMG ALT="" SRC="http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/AHD4/GIF/omacr.gif" height="14" width="6" ALIGN="BOTTOM">z) <OL><LI><OL TYPE="a"><LI TYPE="a">Used to refer to the one designated, implied, mentioned, or understood:<CITE>What kind of soup is that?</CITE> </LI><LI TYPE="a">Used to refer to the one, thing, or type specified as follows: <CITE>The relics found were those of an earlier time.</CITE> </LI><LI TYPE="a">Used to refer to the event, action, or time just mentioned: <CITE>After that, he became a recluse.</CITE> </LI></OL></LI><LI>Used to indicate the farther or less immediate one: <CITE>That is for sale; this is not.</CITE> </LI><LI>Used to emphasize the idea of a previously expressed word or phrase: <CITE>He was fed up, and that to a great degree.</CITE> </LI><LI>The one, kind, or thing; something: <CITE>She followed the calling of that which she loved.</CITE> </LI><LI><B>those</B> Used to indicate an unspecified number of people: <CITE>those who refused to join.</CITE> </LI><LI>Used as a relative pronoun to introduce a clause, especially a restrictive clause: <CITE>the car that has the flat tire.</CITE> </LI><LI><OL TYPE="a"><LI TYPE="a">In, on, by, or with which: <CITE>each summer that the concerts are performed.</CITE> </LI><LI TYPE="a">According to what; insofar as: <CITE>He never knew her, that I know of.</CITE> </LI></OL></LI></OL><BR><I>adj.</I> <I>pl.</I> <B>those </B><OL><LI> Being the one singled out, implied, or understood: <CITE>that place; those mountains.</CITE> </LI>
<LI>Being the one further removed or less obvious: <CITE>That route is shorter than this one.</CITE> </LI></OL><BR>
<I>adv.</I> <OL><LI>To such an extent or degree: <CITE>Is your problem that complicated?</CITE> </LI><LI>To a high degree; very: <CITE>didn't take what he said that seriously.</CITE> </LI></OL><BR><I>conj.</I> <OL><LI>Used to introduce a noun clause that is usually the subject or object of a verb or a predicate nominative: “That contemporary American English is exuberantly vigorous is undeniable” (William Arrowsmith).</LI><LI>Used to introduce a subordinate clause stating a result, wish, purpose, reason, or cause: <CITE>She hoped that he would arrive on time. He was saddened that she felt so little for him.</CITE> </LI>
<LI><OL TYPE="a"><LI TYPE="a">Used to introduce an anticipated subordinate clause following the expletive <I>it</I> occurring as subject of the verb: <CITE>It is true that dental work is expensive.</CITE> </LI><LI TYPE="a">Used to introduce a subordinate clause modifying an adverb or adverbial expression: <CITE>will go anywhere that they are welcome.</CITE> </LI><LI TYPE="a">Used to introduce a subordinate clause that is joined to an adjective or noun as a complement: <CITE>was sure that she was right; the belief that rates will rise soon.</CITE> </LI></OL></LI><LI>Used to introduce an elliptical exclamation of desire: <CITE>Oh, that I were rich!</CITE> </LI></OL><BR><I><B>Idioms:</B></I><BR>
<B><CITE>at that</CITE></B><OL><LI> In addition; besides: <CITE>lived in one room, and a small room at that.</CITE> </LI>
<LI>Regardless of what has been said or implied: <CITE>a long shot, but she just might win at that.</CITE> </LI>
</OL><B><CITE>that is</CITE></B><DL><DD> To explain more clearly; in other words: <CITE>on the first floor, that is, the floor at street level.</CITE> </DD></DL><BR><HR ALIGN="left" WIDTH="25%">[Middle English, from Old English<TT> thæt</TT>. See<TT> to- </TT>in Indo-European Roots.]<BLOCKQUOTE><EM><B>Usage Note: </B></EM>The standard rule requires that <I>that</I> should be used only to introduce a restrictive (or defining) relative clause, which identifies the entity being talked about; in this use it should never be preceded by a comma. Thus, in the sentence <CITE>The house that Jack built has been torn down,</CITE> the clause <I>that Jack built</I> is a restrictive clause identifying the specific house that was torn down. Similarly, in <CITE>I am looking for a book that is easy to read,</CITE> the restrictive clause <I>that is easy to read</I> tells what kind of book is desired. A related rule stipulates that <I>which</I> should be used with nonrestrictive (or nondefining) clauses, which give additional information about an entity that has already been identified in the context; in this use, <I>which</I> is always preceded by a comma. Thus, we say <CITE>The students in Chemistry 101 have been complaining about the textbook, which (not that) is hard to follow.</CITE> The clause <I>which is hard to follow</I> is nonrestrictive in that it does not indicate which text is being complained about; even if the clause were omitted, we would know that the phrase <I>the textbook</I> refers to the text in Chemistry 101.
·Some grammarians extend the rule and insist that, just as <I>that</I> should be used only in restrictive clauses, <I>which</I> should be used only in nonrestrictive clauses. Thus, they suggest that we should avoid sentences such as <CITE>I need a book which will tell me all about city gardening,</CITE> where the restrictive clause <I>which will tell me all about city gardening</I> indicates which sort of book is needed. But this extension of the rule is far from universally accepted, and the use of <I>which</I> with restrictive clauses is common. Furthermore, since <I>that</I> cannot be used with clauses introduced by a preposition (whether or not restrictive), <I>which</I> is used with both clauses when such a clause is joined by <I>and</I> or <I>or</I> to another that does not begin with a preposition, as in <I>It is a philosophy in which the common man may find solace and which many have found reason to praise.</I> Such constructions are often considered cumbersome, however, and
it may be best to recast the sentence completely to avoid the problem. ·<I>That</I> is often omitted in a relative clause when the subject of the clause is different from the word that the clause refers to. Thus, we may say either <CITE>the book that I was reading</CITE> or <CITE>the book I was reading.</CITE> In addition, <I>that</I> is commonly omitted before other kinds of subordinate clauses, as in <CITE>I think we should try again</CITE> where <I>that</I> would precede <I>we.</I> These constructions omitting <I>that</I> are entirely idiomatic, even in more formal contexts. See Usage Note at <A HREF="/search?q=doubt">doubt</A>. See Usage Note at <A HREF="/search?q=this">this</A>. See Usage Note at <A HREF="/search?q=whatever">whatever</A>. See Usage Note at <A HREF="/search?q=which">which</A>. See Usage Note at <A HREF="/search?q=who">who</A>.</BLOCKQUOTE></TD>
</TR></TABLE>
Happy now,
The thing that I liked was the "Limited to 3 per customer"...