If geeks love it, we’re on it

Ballmer’s day in court

Ballmer’s day in court

It’s coming. Microsoft’s always-entertaining CEO Steve Ballmer should get his day in court soon so he can share what he knows about Microsoft’s involvement in Vistagate, the class-action lawsuit claiming Microsoft’s Vista Capable program was deceptive.

The Vista Capable marketing effort was designed to encourage buyers of XP-based systems in 2006 and early-2007 of the compatibility of their purchase with the forthcoming (at the time) Windows Vista. Claimants allege Microsoft lowered the required specs required to be “Vista Capable” to allow Intel and other hardware companies to slap the label on soon-to-be obsolete hardware and sell it to a bamboozled public.

That’s quite a claim. It seems even shadier when there’s evidence that Ballmer called Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini on Jan. 30, 2006; the day Microsoft changed the program’s specs. US District Court Judge Marsha Pechman is calling Ballmer to the stand so he can dish on what went down.

Here’s the suggested conversation in simple terms:

Microsoft: OHAI We have Vista coming soon.
Intel and Friends: HONOES If you tell people, nobody will buy our slow hardware.
Microsoft: Pfft. Whatever.
Intel and Friends: Srsly.
Microsoft: …
Microsoft: Hey, lets bump up the start date for the program.
Intel and Friends: WHAT! We’ll lose $600 million in sales.
Microsoft: Oh crap! We’ll drop the graphics specs and still keep the early start date?
Intel and Friends: Rock out!
Microsoft: ^5
Intel and Friends: ^5

Of course, everyone is innocent until proven otherwise and Microsoft has agreed to comply fully with the court, so we just have to wait and see if the deal is as dirty as suggested.

Comments

  1. Kwitko
    Kwitko Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!
  2. MiracleManS
    MiracleManS I guess I'm not really sure what the problem was with what happened. Did they do it specifically for Intel? I don't know. Its not like they weren't forthcoming with what was necessary to declare something "Vista Capable". So, I guess the issue is that...people are mad they didn't read?
  3. BuddyJ
    BuddyJ In the end, Microsoft created a marketing program telling people OH NO YUR SYSTEM IS GOOD for systems that were less than good. Critics say they initially set the bar high but when OEMs complained that the high bar would kill sales, MS lowered it to appease them and in lowering it, they allowed incompatible or underperforming hardware to carry the label, which then duped the consumer into buying something they may not have otherwise purchased.
  4. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm But that hardware could still run Vista, even if it was Home Basic, couldn't it? Is that not "Vista-capable?"
  5. CB
    CB There's a difference between running Vista and running Vista capably.
  6. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm But then some here would argue that no computer is "Vista-capable." :p
  7. MiracleManS
    MiracleManS I'm with Snark on this on this one, it could run Vista, just not Aero and some of the other bells and whistles. I guess that explains my confusion.
  8. Tim
    Tim A P2 300 Mhz pc with 64 MB of RAM is CAPABLE of running XP, but would it be good? No.

    And if Vista sucks, is ANY computer capable of making it run well? Probably not.
  9. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm Oh look, it's Tim. Hey Tim, what do you really think of Vista?

    Oh, right, we've heard it before.
  10. mas0n
    mas0n The real problem here is that Microsoft has lots of money.
  11. j
    j Question: Since Vista doesn't really run all that well on any computer, can you really say that lowering the spec was wrong? Perhaps if vista was a more stable system it might have worked fine on old hardware. I bet no one really anticipated how bad vista was going to be.
  12. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm Wow. I mean wow.

    A stability argument? Surely you're joking.
  13. Leonardo
    Leonardo
    There's a difference between running Vista and running Vista capably.
    Semantics. For that matter, there are a few million anemic off-the-shelf laptops out there that in stock configuration can barely run XP. Heck, I'm typing on one of them now! I doubled the RAM for a total of 1GB! I'm sure this computer had an XP sumpinoranother sticker on it when new. Yeah, in my eyes, it is XP capable.

    It's an IBM Thinkpad A31. Slow, but oh-so-well built and reliable. Just like a former girlfriend who.....

    oh never mind

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!