it would be good if a gaul and a teut paired up the gaul will be defense and infrastructure and the teut will be raiding. at night the teut send his macemen away to the gaul for protection.
I'd say Gaul, Teut AND Roman..... with the Roman holding all the troops as they have the best wall and can build wheat etc easier with the double-building thing. Gaul's need less protection in the start from raiding- double crannies and plus, troops are so precious people fear traps and avoid them!
Edit- I must type really slow.... keep getting pipped to the post!
If we're in 3 groups, should we arrange sitters so that each groop covers each other... or so that each player has access to an account in each group?
The 2nd option means that if Tom's in group 1 and being attacked and only I'm online.... even though I'm in group 3 and comparitively far away, I can log into Q's account (also group 1) and provide support.
Personally I think sitter in groups..... but there IS a benefit to the other way
I think if we have to stick with sitters and not shared accounts, then use a sitter within your cluster, probably the most active player, and maybe another sitter from a close cluster to provide help in an emergency situation....
Teuton are cheap and offensive based. Defense for them is a two troop approach. Spearmen against cavalry and Paladins for foot troops. On Offense, a lvl20 barracks can crank out 1 maceman every 40 seconds for 250 total resource. That's faster than a maxed out lvl10 village can keep up with... yes, more troops than you can afford. 2160 macemen a day at peak. AWESOME.
Gual... Defensive. Phallanx is all you need to defend against foot and horse. Not really offensive based...
I'm gonna be goin Teuton. I love the aggressiveness. The team idea is perfect. There can be a defensive based player that defends the offensive players while his troops are out raiding, ect. That is virtually flawless.. The only counter to that is if the defender and the person attacking get attacked at the same time. Which quadrant are we gonna set up in this time?
No idea on quad... I'm trying to read through the Alliances to see who's going where. We want to avoid Myth or go out of our way to pick the same quad?
Any suggestions as to who we want to hook up with alliance wise? LEG? [M]? {S}, {U}, DTD?
At the moment I am still not sure. I would like to play again but don't want to spend as much time. So if I play would like to be in a group where there is a more active player. Who could sit for me, and I am happy with Roman (defensive) , as I am not an aggressive player.
At the moment I am still not sure. I would like to play again but don't want to spend as much time. So if I play would like to be in a group where there is a more active player. Who could sit for me, and I am happy with Roman (defensive) , as I am not an aggressive player.
same duchess i was teuton this round. i hated it, im not agressive at all. (well only when i have a HUGE army.)
No idea on quad... I'm trying to read through the Alliances to see who's going where. We want to avoid Myth or go out of our way to pick the same quad?
Any suggestions as to who we want to hook up with alliance wise? LEG? [M]? {S}, {U}, DTD?
Just a thought - may want to avoid Myth and where GodSend goes as we may have just slightly annoyed him lol.
Comments
good idea
I'd say Gaul, Teut AND Roman..... with the Roman holding all the troops as they have the best wall and can build wheat etc easier with the double-building thing. Gaul's need less protection in the start from raiding- double crannies and plus, troops are so precious people fear traps and avoid them!
Edit- I must type really slow.... keep getting pipped to the post!
If we're in 3 groups, should we arrange sitters so that each groop covers each other... or so that each player has access to an account in each group?
The 2nd option means that if Tom's in group 1 and being attacked and only I'm online.... even though I'm in group 3 and comparitively far away, I can log into Q's account (also group 1) and provide support.
Personally I think sitter in groups..... but there IS a benefit to the other way
to reiterate what has already been said, don't sign up at the very beginning, as this will place you among the more hardcore players.
I'll do Roman or Gaul!!!
tttooommm10: roman/gaul
harudath: roman/gaul
Qch2002: gaul
mickyg:Teuton
midge:Teuton
invisible muffin:Teuton
anyone else?
I'd want to not go roman again, just for something different
Gual... Defensive. Phallanx is all you need to defend against foot and horse. Not really offensive based...
More info on everything can be found here (http://help.travian.co.uk/)
Any suggestions as to who we want to hook up with alliance wise? LEG? [M]? {S}, {U}, DTD?
Duchess
same duchess i was teuton this round. i hated it, im not agressive at all. (well only when i have a HUGE army.)
Just a thought - may want to avoid Myth and where GodSend goes as we may have just slightly annoyed him lol.
Maybe not use IC name?
I could imagine our game would be pretty short if we kept it...
If godsend has a memory, IC will be first on his list..
so what?... godsend can throw all he can at us and we'll turn around and kick him in the balls. again...