Post your 3DMark05 Benchmarks Here

SimGuySimGuy Ottawa, Canada
edited February 2007 in Hardware
Download complete! Time to give this baby a run and see it crush both my systems! Meh :)

//Edit: First Run on old P4 System (2400 @ 2700, 512 MB Corsair XMS3700, 9800 @ 9800 Pro). Will bench A64 when I get home later tonight.
«134567…11

Comments

  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Benchmark thread created and stuck :)

    As soon as I get the download, I'll bench my customer's a64 3500+ w/geforce 6800
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    The machine I run at work:
    PIII 600, 512MB RAM, Matrox G200 graphics.

    0 3DMarks.

    I'll bench at home when I get a chance. ;)
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    No screenshot, but:

    Athlon 64 3500+
    512mb RAM
    GeForce 6800 GT
    Asus A8V
    No overclocking whatsoever

    3408
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited September 2004
    A64 3400+ 2.4ghz 512K
    1GB PC3500 2-3-3-8 1T
    Radeon 9700Pro

    3DMark05 2163 Awe Inspiring ;D

    Amazing how a top notch card from 2 yrs ago now sucks... :)

    Athlon XP @ 2.4ghz
    512MB PC3200
    Radeon 9700 Pro

    3DMark05 1898
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    4402 .. first run :D

    Athlon 64 3200+ Clawhammer (1mb cache) stock.
    1gb TwinMOS PC3200.
    Galaxy Glacier 6800GT (stock).
    K8T NEO FISR-2
    Win XP SP2
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    4870 :D:D:D

    No more benchmarking for me tonight... well until Mackanz comes in and wipes the floor with me ;D

    But I do have access to a FX-53.. Im so tempted to take my card into work and fire it up in that baby!
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited September 2004
    Shorty wrote:
    4870 :D:D:D

    No more benchmarking for me tonight... well until Mackanz comes in and wipes the floor with me ;D

    But I do have access to a FX-53.. Im so tempted to take my card into work and fire it up in that baby!
    Dude that's sick. I can't hit that in 03! ;D

    Benches coming shortly, I didn't know it was out until now.

    EDIT
    Maybe not shortly... The download's almost 300 megs. :-/
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    That's stock... I need to find the max overclock of my system to compete with the watercooling 5500+ scores Im seeing on the ORB ;)
  • entropyentropy Yah-Der-Hey (Wisconsin)
    edited September 2004
    Ok, guys, no AF/AA and what resolution? 1024x768, or does it automatically choose a default one??
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    The current version is locked to the correct settings :)
  • entropyentropy Yah-Der-Hey (Wisconsin)
    edited September 2004
    Awesome ... I suppose ... see, it's good for standards. Bad for folks like me who could go, "Oh, I had the resolution way too high is all..." ;)
  • entropyentropy Yah-Der-Hey (Wisconsin)
    edited September 2004
    *sigh*
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    entropy wrote:
    *sigh*
    Never mind mate :D
  • entropyentropy Yah-Der-Hey (Wisconsin)
    edited September 2004
    Lol, but it's depressing! :p I'm like "Woohoo, my first computer I ever built!" (no, that effect still hasn't worn off! :)) and to see it get pummelled in light of all the new technology is, well, disconcerting lol. I'm so tempted to build a new one from scratch ... just have to keep telling myself it does what it needs to for the next 3 years (gonna build top-o-the-line system before college)...but it's tough, lol.

    edit: Shorty, WTF is up with all the different Quote formats? :confused:
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    entropy wrote:
    Lol, but it's depressing! :p I'm like "Woohoo, my first computer I ever built!" (no, that effect still hasn't worn off! :)) and to see it get pummelled in light of all the new technology is, well, disconcerting lol. I'm so tempted to build a new one from scratch ... just have to keep telling myself it does what it needs to for the next 3 years (gonna build top-o-the-line system before college)...but it's tough, lol.

    edit: Shorty, WTF is up with all the different Quote formats? :confused:
    I think my scores pretty good but I know it's gonna get creamed by someone by the time I wake up tomorrow morning ;D

    Get used to it, there is always someone with a better system ;)

    Be happy with what ya got, if it does what ya need and works well.. that's more important than a synthetic benchmark :)
  • KometeKomete Member
    edited September 2004
    Well This is the first benchmark where overclocking my cpu had 0 effect. my 1st attemp was 1933 after I overclocked my video card it only went up 100 points. No matter what I put my cpu at it wouldn't budge past 2034.

    xp2500m @ 2500mghz
    ati 9500 pro

    *will work for new video card. :bawling:
  • TheSmJTheSmJ
    edited September 2004
    4520

    System in sig (and in compare link for more detail).

    It's times like this that prove even the deepest wallets don't always get the highest benchmarks (as is the case with the A64 machine Brian had built for a customer).
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Downloading that monster now. 290MB! Wow, that's even a big'in for cable modem!
  • iceberqiceberq
    edited September 2004
    edited: nevermind, slow performance was only because of older 61.77 drivers... with 66.51s...

    4527


    edit again:

    5336
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=67627
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    iceberq wrote:
    Any idea why I'm scoring so low? Only high 3000s with A64 3500+ / 6800 GT all stock, i've tried cool 'n quiet on and off, and it made no difference.. 61.77 nvidia drivers

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=24372
    Take ya time to tweak ya system before a run :)

    Make sure you have high performance settings in your display adapter settings & turn off antivirus & unnecessary programs/services :)
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    It could be lots of things - have you checked your system for spyware or other background processes? Shut off your Antivirus software while running the benchmark. There are a ton of factors that dictate system performance.....

    Give us as much info as you can, but not in this thread :) Start a thread in the graphics/video forum and the pros here will help you tweak your system for sure.
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited September 2004
    Specs:
    -ASUS PC-DL Deluxe dual s604/i875P Xeon board

    -2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz/533FSB/512k CPUs @ 160x20 (3.2GHz)

    -2GB PC3200 DDR @ PC2700 (max speed the board will support)- 4x 512MB sticks in dual channel

    -Leadtek 6800GT @ stock (350/1000 Core/RAM)

    **no tweaking what-so-ever**

    Result:
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    I need a reinstall. This os is hogged.
    11X200 at sucky timings, 11,3,3 cas 2.5
    1.5 gb memory
    x800 pro vivo flashed to XT PE
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Yep.. Mackanz ate my score ;D
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited September 2004
    Upgraded to ATI v4.10 Beta drivers
    Radeon 9700 Pro

    Old
    A64 2.4ghz 2163
    AXP 2.4ghz 1898


    New
    A64 2.4ghz 2204
    AXP 2.4ghz 2052
  • BudBud Chesterfield, Va
    edited September 2004
    here's mine nothing to brag about
    2500+ barton @ 2GHz (200x10)
    NFS-7
    1.5GB PC3500
    160 Seagate Sata
    9800 Pro

    2498
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    The new ATI beta's does wonders for their 256mb cards. I got a 1200 points increase just by changing the driver.
  • RWBRWB Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Athlon64 3000+ running 2.1GHz
    1GB PC3200 Kingston HyperX DDR
    MSI Motherboard and MSI Video Card Radeon 9800 Pro with XT core, running 405/378 Omega 4.9's driver settings are set to what I like to play games on, except AA is App. Pref.

    I only got 2024???? How does someone with "less" of a machine:D get a higher score, such as a Radeon 9500?!
  • BudBud Chesterfield, Va
    edited September 2004
    where can i get the 4.10 beta ati driver at?
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Mackanz wrote:
    The new ATI beta's does wonders for their 256mb cards. I got a 1200 points increase just by changing the driver.
    Of course being an overclocking guru helps :respect: mate :D
Sign In or Register to comment.