Post your 3DMark05 Benchmarks Here

24567…11

Comments

  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    As for now, Intel cpu's and Nvidia videocards gets murdered in 3D05 thanks to the beta driver.
    Bud, click the link to "driver hotfix" in this link to the Ati infobase. Now, i didn't do any cleaning of the old drivers and the control panel and we all know how much that helps.

    http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4649.html

    Shorty, that's a little over the top mate. I'm quite useless in this stuff but i try to learn every day.
    OT: How far is the zip:PE7 8EW from you Dan?
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Mackanz wrote:
    As for now, Intel cpu's and Nvidia videocards gets murdered in 3D05 thanks to the beta driver.
    Bud, click the link to "driver hotfix" in this link to the Ati infobase. Now, i didn't do any cleaning of the old drivers and the control panel and we all know how much that helps.

    http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4649.html

    Shorty, that's a little over the top mate. I'm quite useless in this stuff but i try to learn every day.
    OT: How far is the zip:PE7 8EW from you Dan?
    Just learning.. pah.. you got me started.. I wanted to get a good score on my 6800 before you came in and crushed it :D

    That zip is close!

    Peterborough.. it's a train ride away! :D
  • BudBud Chesterfield, Va
    edited September 2004
    2517 after new catalyst install, also whats a good overclocking util for video cards? Well i got powerstrip and tweeked my card a little and now got 2689
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Another ATI 9700 Pro bench:

    System 1 (in signature)
    9700 OC @ 341/320
    Omega 2.5.76
    Open GL and Direct 3D set to "High Performance"
  • fudgamfudgam Upstate New York
    edited September 2004
    Athlon xp 2600+ @ 204x11
    1 gig corsair xms 3200
    9800 pro 256 mb
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    So currently..

    Mack is top,
    I am second
    and Iceberq just nudged the SMJ out of third place

    Cool :cool:
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited September 2004
    Looks like 256MB Video Ram really makes a difference in 3DMark05
  • TheSmJTheSmJ
    edited September 2004
    Not to be outdone so easily:

    5117!

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=46942
  • MadballMadball Fort Benton, MT
    edited September 2004
    2563

    AXP 3100+
    1024mb pc3200
    9800 pro 128mb flashed to XT speeds

    man my cpu fps was horrible
  • djstubbsdjstubbs NJ
    edited October 2004
    I got 248.

    screw my 5200 ultra.
  • XtRaVaXtRaVa
    edited October 2004
    o.o;;
  • TheSmJTheSmJ
    edited October 2004
    Wow, Dan still has yet to try and regain second place?

    I feel like the king of the thread... or the duke anyways...
  • XtRaVaXtRaVa
    edited October 2004
    Woah...ran 3dmark and the first test was running with like 11 FPS, and then when it got to the second test I got an error saying it was out of video memory! Something definately not right here...
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited October 2004
    I got the same score whether I was running F@h or not in the background ...I forgot I had it on!!!

    Also ...I don't see the cat 4.10's anywhere to be found.
  • paramdogparamdog
    edited October 2004
    3DMark2005(with 1.1 Update) Score: 3808
    CPU Score: 5109

    AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (running at 230 x 10.5 = 2415GHz)
    MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
    128MB eVGA Nvidia 6800 (overclocked frequencies)
    WD 74GB Raptor SATA 10,000RPM
    Zalman CNPS7000A-Cu
    1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC4000(running at DDR460 2.5-2-2-6)
    Antec NeoPower 480
    Thermaltake Tsunami Series Case
  • iceberqiceberq
    edited October 2004
    updated compare link, 5336 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=67627 :D
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited October 2004
    3DMark05 v110 Patch

    3DMark05 Hotfix 110
      * A possible exploit to inflate results in 3DMark05 version 1.0.0 has been fixed * Updated Entech DLL * One incorrect unit in the MS Excel importer has been fixed

    Note: Hotfix 110 updates your 3DMark05 (100) to 3DMark05 (110). This hotfix is required to submit your result to the ORB.

    Futuremark Link
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited October 2004
    TheSmJ wrote:
    Wow, Dan still has yet to try and regain second place?

    I feel like the king of the thread... or the duke anyways...
    When I get some time this weekend.. Im gonna see what I can do :D
  • XtRaVaXtRaVa
    edited October 2004
    any ideas why I would have gotten the error I did?
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited October 2004
    csimon wrote:
    Also ...I don't see the cat 4.10's anywhere to be found.

    Right Here Csimon!

    http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4649.html
  • BudBud Chesterfield, Va
    edited October 2004
    does that patch make any diff. on scores? does raid do much for scores?
  • TheSmJTheSmJ
    edited October 2004
    XtRaVa wrote:
    any ideas why I would have gotten the error I did?


    That's not for this thread.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited October 2004
    XtRaVa wrote:
    any ideas why I would have gotten the error I did?
    Play Nice SMJ.

    Try Downloading and installing the V4.10 Beta drivers. Make sure your running DX 9.0C


    http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4649.html
  • XtRaVaXtRaVa
    edited October 2004
    TheSmJ wrote:
    That's not for this thread.

    Soz your right, it was just coz it was an error i got with 3dmark I asked here. My bad, thanks omega I have dx9c but I dont have cat...
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited October 2004
    System 2 (signature)
    ATI 9500 -> soft mod 9700P @ 300/282
    (score 1744 @ default clock)
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited October 2004
    Omega65 wrote:
    Upgraded to ATI v4.10 Beta drivers
    Radeon 9700 Pro

    Old
    A64 2.4ghz 2163
    AXP 2.4ghz 1898


    New
    A64 2.4ghz 2204
    AXP 2.4ghz 2052

    OC'd the A64 to HTT 250Mhz & 2.5ghz - Same score :banghead:
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited October 2004
    Omega65 wrote:
    Right Here Csimon!

    http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4649.html
    Is it that hotfix link I'm supposed to be dloading?
    looks like this "wxp-w2k-8-07-018380E.exe"

    Well that's what I installed anyway and this is what I got ...with a little more tweaking and oc'ing I'm confident I would break 3k
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited October 2004
    Omega65 wrote:
    OC'd the A64 to HTT 250Mhz & 2.5ghz - Same score :banghead:

    Well at least we know it's not as CPU-dependent as other benchmarks... although my Xeons are still about 1000pts. behind than A64 systems with the same GPU... I may end up ordering that Iwill board anyhow. :-/
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited October 2004
    Aquamark and 3D2001 still reigns as the better cpu+video benchmark. 3D2003 and 3D2005 are primarily a videocard benchmark. Athlon XP or dual Xeon's etc have no chance against A64 in Aquamark/3D2001.
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited October 2004
    Mackanz... I think you're right, although my Xeons are much closer to A64 systems with the same GPU (the 6800GT) in 3dmark 03 than they are in 05... I need to run 01 on the Xeons when I get back to school.
Sign In or Register to comment.